| Objectives |
Low Performance | At or Below Average | At or Above Average | Exemplary Performance |
|
Web Design, Spelling & Grammar
|
2 points Student uses backgroungs and fonts that are difficult for the instructor to read. There are multiple spelling or grammar errors. |
3 points Student uses backgrounds and fonts that are occasionally difficult to read. There are more than two spelling or grammar errors. |
4 points Student uses backgrounds and fonts that are easy to read, but they do not fit the overall theme or "feel" of the web-site. There are less than two spelling or grammar errors. |
5 points Student uses backgrounds and fonts that are easy to read and fit the theme or "feel" of the web-site. There are no spelling or grammar errors. |
|
Effectiveness and Direction Following
|
2 points Project is lacking several key elements (or "Parts"), which makes for a poor represention of the student. |
3 points Project is missing more two key elements (or "Parts"), which makes the project an incomplete represention of the student. |
4 points The Project includes most material needed for the instructor to have a fair undersanding of the student. There may be one key element (or "Part") missing. |
5 points Project includes all key elements (or "Part") and gives the instructor a superb understanding of the student. |
|
Originality
|
2 points The student Project is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics. The site shows little or no attempt at original thought. |
3 points The student Project shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness in one or two of the key elements (or "Parts"). |
4 points The student Project shows some originality and inventiveness. The content is preseneted in an interesting way. |
5 points The student Project shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are preseneted in a unique and interesting way. |